Patience and Persistence

This reflection is not about a newly discovered Jane Austen manuscript à la Pride and Prejudice or Sense and Sensibility, but speaks to the few insights I’ve gained while making manuscript submissions to publishers for consideration. This is the one step that writers resist taking, for by so doing, they risk receiving a rejection. (The more of those you get, the thicker the skin you develop–or so “they” say!) The process of sending one’s work out, in days prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, had often involved acquiring padded envelopes, correctly-sized cardboard boxes, brown wrapping paper, and stamps. A trek or drive to the post office would follow, where a weigh-in of the item would have to take place before the postage could be determined and affixed. In other words, it was a time-consuming bother! My mailings had been very few and far between, and by that, I don’t mean weeks or months, but years! The process required patience and ultimately, persistence. Rarely do writers meet all the requirements spelled out in an editor’s or agent’s wish list when their manuscripts land in the slush pile on someone’s desk. As both published and unpublished writers already know, learning about the process of creative writing is a life-long venture. In my own case, I’ll always need to be reminded of the essential elements of this craft, whether I pursue this through my personal choice of reading (fiction and non-fiction), or the workshops and courses I choose to attend.

Every word of praise and constructive criticism may help you hone your craft. Enter local, provincial (state), regional and national contests as often as possible.

If you are visiting this page, perhaps you already belong to one or more writers’ groups–safe havens where members share the same or similar goals as they seek to improve their writing skills. Part of this sharing may involve laughter or tears, for manuscript rejections from agents and editors are far, far more common than are acceptances.

The Truth Be Told:

“Most manuscripts are rejected because they’re just plain bad. The stories are trite, the characters wooden, the endings predictable. The plots may smack of didacticism or patronize the young reader…. One more point: General fiction is the most competitive genre in any age group of children’s books. It’s also the most subjective, meaning your manuscript has to appeal to exactly the right editor.”–Laura Backes, founder and editor of “The Children’s Book Insider“.

Yet don’t despair. You may be an excellent writer with a great story, but there could be any number of reasons why it was rejected, such as the publisher having just published a book on the same or similar topic.

Sometimes our rejections may receive a personal note of encouragement or constructive criticism despite being passed over. We often talk about the latter category as “good rejects”–an oxymoron in the view of most people–yet it’s the “good rejects” that keep many of us writing and hoping for that break-through publication. A more likely than not scenario these days is that you will be sent an automated, computer-generated reply that indicates a submission was received, and “if you don’t hear back from us within six to nine months, please assume we’re taking a pass on your manuscript for publication.” Even so, I can’t imagine going through life without spending at least some of the time doing the one activity I enjoy most.

Persistence Pays Off…Sometimes: 

It’s no secret the late Madeleine L’Engle’s A Wrinkle in Time received twenty-six rejections before it was finally accepted for publication, or that J.K. Rowling’s first Harry Potter novel–Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone–was turned down a dozen times before it found a home with Bloomsbury Press. There are many other examples of well-known authors such as John Grisham, Stephen King, Dr. Seuss and Frank Herbert who all had to endure endless submission/rejection cycles before seeing their books in print. What each of them possessed in common with the others was first, an undying belief in the worthiness of their writing projects, and second, their ability to persist in their efforts to find a publisher.

Same Chapter, Three Different Opinions:

As Laura Backes suggested in the above quotation, it’s wise to remember that the evaluation of a piece of writing is often subjective on the part of the reader. For example, a literary agent noted that a particular chapter in one of my novels was “pitch-perfect”, and she’d liked the way I’d introduced the future significance of a particular male character. She suggested I rewrite the beginning chapters to be as tightly constructed as that one. A contest judge, on the other hand, who had evaluated this novel prior to my agency submission, suggested that the character I had developed further in it was unnecessary to the storyline, and that I should remove him altogether. And then a third reader–a paid freelance editor–wondered why that same chapter was even there; she thought I should cut it from the manuscript in its entirety. This difference of opinion is not unusual, and so in the end, a writer has to weigh all the praise and criticism provided by others, and then revise the manuscript according to his or her own gut feeling of what would make it stronger.

Thanks for the Compliment…Oops; I Mean Criticism:

Sometimes a reader may compare your work to that of a well-known author, but not in the way you might hope. Here’s an example: “As with some of A.A. Milne’s humour with language, young children miss the point.”If a child “misses the point”, does it really matter? Are not word play, rhythm and imagery all equally relevant to one’s learning experience and enjoyment of language? And here’s another comparison: Silly Sea Songs: Nonsense Verse and Other Poems to Rock Your Boat remind me of Dennis Lee’s work for children: they are funny, playful, and ‘hang together well.” The standard wait time for a response is now six to nine months, so one has to wonder if writing for publication is worth the time and effort. If one is truly a writer, then one cannot help but answer “yes”. One writer I know, received a response from a publisher one year after she had submitted her manuscript for consideration. I was shocked when my postal box received a reply two years beyond the submission date! (And yes, you can be “a writer” or “author” without being traditionally published. Anyone who is responsible for the content of a website or blog, is considered the author of that blog of website.)

Self-Publishing–To Do or Not to Do–That is the Question:

Beatrix Potter had so much trouble trying to get The Tale of Peter Rabbit accepted by an editor, she printed copies for her own family before it was picked up by Frederick Warne.  The publisher advised her to do her sketches in colour, rather than black and white, and obviously that was a good move! So if you’ve only approached two or three companies before giving up on the idea of seeing your name in print, keep submitting…or maybe it’s time to consider one of several options available to you today. If you do decide to self-publish, be sure you have an independent editor go through your manuscript first. To find the best resources on self-publishing and e-book publication, click on the link to Jane Friedman’s blog located on the right of the screen. She’s an expert on just about everything to do with the world of digital publishing and marketing, and often invites well-known authors, editors, agents, marketers and others to write guest posts on her blog.

March 19, 2013

ON REJECTION, Continued:

I found a number of quotations online, recently, concerning author rejection letters and well…they made me laugh. (Now you know I have a warped sense of humour!)

My favourite one was addressed to Samuel Johnson (the source didn’t know which book the editor was referring to): “Your manuscript is both good and original; but the part that is good is not original, and the part that is original is not good.”

To Stephen King, re: Carrie: “We are not interested in science fiction which deals with negative utopias. They do not sell.” [Negative utopias?!]

To F. Scott Fitzgerald, re: The Great Gatsby: “You’d have a decent book if you’d get rid of that Gatsby character.”